跳到頁面主要內容區
:::
:::

Full-Time Teachers

Title《經濟社會與文化權利國際公約》與地方自治體
Year98
Semester2
Publish Date2010/06/01
Journal Name《經濟社會與文化權利國際公約》與地方自治體
Journal Name OtherInternational Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and Local Autonomy Governments
All Author胡慶山
Unit淡江大學亞洲研究所
Publisher臺北市：臺灣國際法學會
Volume台灣國際法季刊=Taiwan International Law Quarterly 7(2)，頁7-38
Summary本論文以「中華民國」政府「批准」《兩公約》，並立法通過《兩公約施行法》爲起點，探討如何以「權利」論重新審視經濟社會文化權利國際公約？經濟社會文化權利國際公約委員會的解釋如何？與此相關的《經濟社會文化權利國際公約》第二條第一項的法解釋如何？至於地方自治體方面，則以日本地方自治體－大阪府的人權實施爲例，探討日本地方自治法下的條例制定，最後以對地方自治體落實經濟社會文化權利國際公約進行分析。 In this paper, the ”Republic of China” government ”ratified” the International two Covenants on Human Rights, including the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, legislated ”the law of the implement of the two conventions”, is to explore what the obligations of States parties under the International Convention on Economic, Social and Cultural rights are: how to reexamine the International Convention on Economic, Social and Cultural rights by ”rights” theory? What is interpretation made by the International Convention on Economic, Social and Cultural rights Committee? What is the legal interpretation of Article 2 (1) in the International Convention on Economic, Social and Cultural rights? The above relevant points for the International Convention on Economic, Social and Cultural rights will be addressed. As for the local autonomy government, it will discuss under the Local Autonomy Law in Japan enacting the Ordinance beyond the law, the Japanese local government in Osaka Prefecture''s the implementation of human rights; in the end, pointing to the In this paper, the ”Republic of China” government ”ratified” the International two Covenants on Human Rights, including the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, legislated ”the law of the implement of the two conventions”, is to explore what the obligations of States parties under the International Convention on Economic, Social and Cultural rights are: how to reexamine the International Convention on Economic, Social and Cultural rights by ”rights” theory? What is interpretation made by the International Convention on Economic, Social and Cultural rights Committee? What is the legal interpretation of Article 2 (1) in the International Convention on Economic, Social and Cultural rights? The above relevant points for the International Convention on Economic, Social and Cultural rights will be addressed. As for the local autonomy government, it will discuss under the Local Autonomy Law in Japan enacting the Ordinance beyond the law, the Japanese local government in Osaka Prefecture''s the implementation of human rights; in the end, pointing to the suggestions for local autonomy government how to implementate the International Convention on Economic, Social and Cultural rights, the argument as a conclusion.
Keyword國際人權兩公約;經濟社會文化權利國際公約;權利論;經濟社會文化權利國際公約委員會;地方自治體;社會權;上乘條例;岔出條例;the International two Covenants on Human Rights;the International Covenant on Economic;Social and Cultural Rights;rights theory;the International Covenant on Economic;Social and Cultural Rights Committee;local autonomy government;social rights;superior Ordinance;fork out Ordinance
Use LangChinese
ISSN(ISBN)1818-4185
Journalnature國內
Level,Other
UniversityCooperation
CorrespondingAuthor
Reviewsystem否
Country中華民國
Open Call for Papers
PublicationStyle紙本
置頂